Constructing m&a valuation: how do merger evaluation methods differ as uncertainty and controversy vary?

H. Kang, W. Woo, R. M. Burton, and W. Mitchell, “Constructing m&a valuation: how do merger evaluation methods differ as uncertainty and controversy vary?,” Journal of organization design, vol. 7, iss. 1, p. 2, 2018.

BibTeX

@article {kang2018constructing,
year = {2018},
volume = {7},
title = {Constructing M\&A valuation: how do merger evaluation methods differ as uncertainty and controversy vary?},
publisher = {Springer},
pages = {2},
number = {1},
journal = {Journal of Organization Design},
biburl = {https://zeal.global/publications/constructing-m-a-valuation-how-do-merger-evaluation-methods-differ-as-uncertainty-and-controversy-vary},
urltitle = {constructing-m-a-valuation-how-do-merger-evaluation-methods-differ-as-uncertainty-and-controversy-vary},
author = {Kang, Hyoung-Goo and Woo, Wonseok and Burton, Richard M and Mitchell, Will}
}